What is Jessie’s position on the defence of our national sovereignty, Defence spending and Australia’s strategic alliance with the US and UK?

Answer

I understand people’s concerns regarding the stability of our national defence, security and trade relationships as we see rapid escalation in world events and traditional relationships under strain. I support the need for strong defence policy, to protect our sovereignty. 

In relation to AUKUS – this agreement is costing Australian taxpayers a significant amount, up to $368bn till the mid-2050s.

Developments in US politics over the last 12 months have seen a period of significant policy volatility in Washington and this has raised concern about our alliance. While this alliance with the United States has been central to Australia’s security for decades, these changed dynamics are prompting questions about whether AUKUS continues to align with Australia’s interests and values.  Many Australians are questioning whether AUKUS could compromise our sovereignty or lock us into the political swings and foreign policy agenda of the US. There have also been media reports that there is no guarantee that Australia will receive the defence equipment (submarines) for which we have already sent $1.6bn to the US.   

I support the calls from a number of current and former politicians for a comprehensive review of AUKUS. This is a contract with far-reaching implications for our economy and national security but there is minimal transparency and virtually no parliamentary oversight or accountability. A review should inform Australians about whether AUKUS is a good use of our resources and the best option for our security.

Climate change has been highlighted as the greatest risk to our security, regional stability and to safety, wellbeing and livelihoods by the Australian Security Leaders Climate Group (ASLCG - a group of former and current defence and security leaders, chaired by the former head of the Defence Force, Admiral Chris Barrie). The advice from this eminent group is clear – climate change must be addressed as a clear and present risk – the link between climate policy and national and human security is inseparable. The Office of National Intelligence (ONI) undertook a climate risk assessment that was provided to the Australian government in 2023 and partially disclosed to the public in September 2025. This assessment warns that rapid, escalating climate impacts pose severe threats to national security, infrastructure, and regional stability. Key findings highlight risks from extreme weather, including massive surges in heat-related deaths and, by 2050, potential risks to 1.5 million Australians from sea-level rises. 

In 2025 the Government chose not to add a 'climate trigger' in the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. This trigger would formally integrate climate change impacts into environmental approval laws, ensuring major projects align with emissions reduction targets. I will continue to pressure the government to enact the climate protections that are necessary for our security.